bkooksd5的部落格

When you think how several bad matches we were competent to see in attendance is no sound out it was a bad tournament! When you watch at the men's tombola and the way the programing was made during the event, you may ask yourself, was it genuinely a great US Open?

As lover of the game and in the end a gala person, I do not deprivation to cut from the serious justify and deed of Roger Federer that is so a immensely proficient private and indubitably not trusty for clear in your mind manifest flaws in the set of connections. Which can not put a stop to me from sounding at the asymmetrical way the order of play, the present time of play, the courts fixed and even peculiarly semipermanent break periods relating matches that should have all and sundry else next to big press results on their foreheads. Starting at the top of the mens draw, if you return a solemn countenance at it your jaws will glob low:

Roger Federer Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Wild Card

The initial hierarchical contestant in the top 60(!) that Roger Federer baby-faced was Feliciano Lopez (ranked 60) in the 4th stout of the later 16's! That scheme 16 men left in a outline of 128 players!

Considering that in the 1920s and 1930s wherever the contestant of the previous US Open lone had to production the knockout of a relative tourney after everyone's killed themselves antagonistic all other in hard matches! In 2007 we have not evolved much, if we analyze the facts near honour the defeater of the US Open 2007 by decency of musical performance qualifiers in the initial 4 rounds, he singular had to cavort 2 more than provoking matches next Bill Tilden for illustration in 1939, that is the quarter-finals (last 8) and the semi-finals (last cardinal) of the tournament!

Of flight path the record books and the media will publicity this integral thing! But is it truly fair-and-square to say that near was an even gully and the prizewinning player won?

Even though I would close to to, I am not active to approach the nether of the game of chance and the physical knock-on effect those 3 1/2 and 4-hour matches had on the players mixed up. My adjacent sound out is how substantially colored can scheduling be? From what I see discrimination in programing light modern world is illimitable.

Given the amount of cache and tennis existence a white-collar sport, we would deduce equalised component periods and stipulations would be provided to all players. Not correct, let's take the variety of Roger Federer and Djokovic's parcours in the tourney.

Day 1: Monday, 27 August Roger Federer (SUI)[1]def Scoville Jenkins (USA) (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 2: Tuesday, 28 August Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Robin Haase (NED) (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 3: Wednesday, 29 August Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Paul Capdeville (CHI) (Night Match 7:00 PM) (Cool daytime match!)

Day 5: Friday, 31 August Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3]def Radek Stepanek (CZE) (11:00 AM Day Match) 4 hour ignitor on assembly temperatures healed complete 30 Celsius! Both players tie up to heat energy stroke!

Day 6: Saturday, 1 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def John Isner (USA) (4:00 PM Day Match) (Much refrigerator temperatures after 11:00 to 15:00 after N.D. in most recent day)

Day 7: Sunday, 2 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Juan Martin Del Potro (ARG) (Cool Night Match 7:00 PM)

Day 8: Monday, 3 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Feliciano Lopez (ESP) (Cool Night Match after 7:00 PM)

Day 9: Tuesday, 4 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Juan Monaco (ARG)[23] (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 10: Wednesday, 5 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Andy Roddick (USA)[5] (CoolNight Match 7:00 PM)

Day 11: Thursday, 6 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Carlos Moya (ESP)[17] (Cool Night Match 7:00 PM) Notice the stress of rest: Previous to the billet and the semis Roger had 2 years and 16hrs (64hrs) Djokovic had 1 day and 12hrs (36hrs) or 28hrs smaller quantity catnap after Federer! This medium that when Federer came to the dying he was as fresh as a lucre in the antemeridian dew, spell Djokovic was much close to a wilted lettuce from the searing sun.

Day 13: Saturday, 8 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def David Ferrer (ESP)[15] (12:00 NOON Day Match) On board temperatures healthy ended 30 Celsius! Novak Djokovic lock to boil stroke! While Roger contend on the aforesaid day at almost 4:00 in some ice chest conditions!

Day 13: Saturday, 8 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)[4] (About 4:00 Following Djokovic's Day Match)

Day 14: Sunday, 9 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] (Not Before 4:30 PM)

All of this and not to comment what was finished on Day 10: Wednesday, 5 September to Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)[4] def Tommy Haas (GER)[10] (11:00 AM Day Match) On board temperatures fine finished 30 Celsius! While Roger compete on the aforementioned day at 7:00 PM in the chilly gentle wind of the evening!

Some will say: But Djokovic mental state did not grasp up. I will relate them: If you think the reality that foregoing to the living accommodations and the semis Roger had 2 days and 16hrs (64hrs) rest, Djokovic had 1 day and 12hrs (36hrs) or 28hrs less remains past Federer and if you had contend nether the temperatures Novak Djokovic did kick up your heels to the element of almost having a heat-stroke in the matches hostile Radek Stepanek & David Ferrer (semi-final), patch your foe (Roger Federer) compete in the water-cooled breezes of the evening, your psychological state would be a lot much insubstantial and your article and be concerned would likewise be a lot weaker after that of your powerfully unwearied opponent! "His neural structure wilted from thus far unprecedented weariness" (Vladimir Nabokov).

Imagine the anger if the identical was through with in the 100 meter drop in Athletics at the Olympics! Now realize that pains and weariness from each lawn tennis clash can be the the same to more than past a marathon!

This reminds me of Wimbledon 2007 where on earth Nadal had to gambol 5 life in a row patch Federer invigorated 5 days!

When we all know that at this rank of match all slender creep counts and if we manifestation at the facts 28hrs much part for Federer and musical performance in the cold breezes of the eve while others are in the hot sun for hours, is not a miniature edge, this is equal to straight-out preference and mental object of the furthermost primary principles of equity in sports scheduling!

No phenomenon that boyish Novak Djokovic was shaky on his stamina from the original barb in the definitive and that effortless mistakes creeped up on him during the course of instruction of the friction match. I have no worries in my mind, if a even scheduling musical performance grazing land had been set in former rounds, Roger Federer would not have had a chance! All you got to do is appearance at the valuation queue 7/6 , 7/6, 6/4, Djokovic control v set points opposed to Federer in the original set and different two in the second, just furnish preadolescent Djokovic 20% more time out and Roger would have been eclipsed!

As I same before, this is not Roger Federers fault and if in attendance is cause I like to timepiece and see successful tournaments it is Roger! To end I essential add that Roger has decent court game superior and athleticism not to obligation these unjust advantages and by seeing Rogers conduct and truthfulness I am complimentary that he does not o.k. of what is active on! We inevitability to swing tennis distant from the 1900 hundreds into the 21st century!